![]() By surveying participants, they find that recruiters judge those making spelling mistakes to be poorer communicators and less hard-working.Looking to land your next job via LinkedIn? Conversely, "recruiters could interpret spelling errors in a resume as a violation of behavioral norms for women, but less so for men," they wrote.ĭespite the limits of a simulated setting, the researchers said the findings raise concerns about the need for making hiring procedures more fair. ![]() This could point to reviewers using education as an indication of intelligence or volunteering of interpersonal skills, thus being more likely to excuse spelling mistakes. In contrast, those who indicated doing volunteer work enjoyed a "buffering effect," with recruiters more likely to discount their spelling mistakes. Women were also prone to be penalized more, albeit marginally. The research spanned eight fictitious vacancies including both blue-collar and white-collar roles, such as being an air traffic controller or secretary, and found that those applying for blue-collar roles tended to be judged more harshly for resumes with five spelling mistakes. Other aspects like an applicant's gender, hobbies and education level were also tweaked.īut not all resumes are made equal. Each recruiter was asked to review three graduate resumes, with spelling errors ranging among zero, two or five. The findings were based on 1,335 resumes reviewed by 445 real-life recruiters in Flanders, a Dutch-speaking region of northern Belgium. ![]() ![]() ![]() "Recruiters disapprove of not only error-laden resumes but also, as we now evidenced, apply penalties for resumes containing relatively fewer errors," the authors wrote. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |